Marx's Critique of Moral Philosophy

Studies in Ethics ›› 2004 (6): 100-104.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Marx's Critique of Moral Philosophy

LUO Qiuli, HE Liangan

Hanshang normal College, Chaozhou, Guangdong 521041 China;
Hunan administration institute, Hunan Changsha 410067 China

Received:2004-08-13 Online:2004-11-10 Published:2022-03-18

马克思的道德哲学批判

罗秋立, 何良安

韩山师范学院,广东潮洲 521041;
湖南省委党校哲学部,湖南长沙 410006

作者简介:罗秋立(1970-),男,韩山师范学院政史系讲师,复旦大学哲学系2002级博士。何良安(1967-),男,湖南省委党校、湖南行政学院哲学部副教授,复旦大学哲学系 2002级博士。

Abstract

Abstract: It is species being that confirm human being is social being and has no eternal nature, which means more than the content of human being that Aristotle had given. By analysing species life activity, Marx formed his own moral principle and threw his doubt upon the effective of any others. Marx regarded free activity as human's ultimate value and substance of moral area, which is the unityof activity as means and as object.

Key words: species being, activity, moral critique

摘要： 通过彰显马克思的“类存在物”及其“有意识的生命活动”、“自由自觉的活动”等概念的意蕴可以使其被遮蔽了的道德哲学批判得到澄明。人作为“类存在物”,不但指认了人是社会的存在物,而且指证了永恒不变之人性观的虚幻性,从而超越了亚里士多德的“人是政治动物”的内涵;使人成为“类存在物”的“有意识的生命活动”则内置了马克思对道德准则的理解,使他对任何的非人格化的超历史的道德形式主义的合法性产生质疑;而人的自由自觉的活动体现了手段性活动与目的性活动统一,因而成为人的终极价值和道德本体,这构成了对各种形式的道德目的论的批判。

关键词: 类存在物, 活动, 道德批判

CLC Number:

B82-09

LUO Qiuli, HE Liangan. Marx's Critique of Moral Philosophy[J]. Studies in Ethics, 2004(6): 100-104.

罗秋立, 何良安. 马克思的道德哲学批判[J]. 伦理学研究, 2004(6): 100-104.

References

[1] R. Tucker, Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx, Cambridge University Press. N.Y.1961, P12
[2] A. W. Wood,“Marx' Immoralism”, Chavance. ed. Marx en Perspective, Editions de l' Ecole des Hautes en Sciences Sociales, 1985.
[3] [英] 肖恩·塞耶斯,分析马克思主义与道德,载[加] 罗伯特·韦尔,凯尔森编,鲁克俭等译,分析马克思主义新论[C],中国人民大学出版社,2002年,68
[4] [6] [16] [27] [28] [德] 马克思,1844年经济学哲学手稿[M],人民出版社,2000年,56,57,57,81,78
[5] [希] 亚里士多德,政治学[M],1252b28—1253a5
[7] [8] [希] 亚里士多德,尼各马可伦理学[M],1138b18—34,1113a16—30
[9] 马克思恩格斯选集,第3卷[M],人民出版社,1995年,306
[10] 马克思恩格斯选集,第1卷[M],人民出版社,1995年,292
[11] [希] 亚里士多德著,廖申白译注,尼各马可伦理学[M] 商务印书馆,2003年,第3页,注③
[12] Alasdair MacIntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? University of NotreDame Press, 1988, p94
[13] 汪子嵩等.希腊哲学史(第3卷)(下)[M].北京:人民出版社,2003年,942
[14] [19] Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue, University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, p38, pp57-59
[15] [17] 马克思恩格斯全集,第3卷,第1卷[M],人民出版社,1960年,42-43,150
[18] Allen. W. Wood, Karl Marx, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984, p235
[20] Alasdair MacIntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? University of NotreDame Press, 1988, chs. 10-11,18-20
[21] Eugene Kamenka, The Ethical Foundation of Marxism(2nd,ed) Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston, 1972, pp156-157
[22] George Brenkert,“Marx and Utilitarianism”, CJP, Vol.5.No.3 (Nov. 1975),R.G.Peffer, Marxism, Morality and Social Justice, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 1990, pp119-120
[23] R. G. Peffer, Marxism, Morality and Social Justice, New Jersey: PrincetonUniversity Press. 1990, p123
[24] [25] 马克思恩格斯,德意志意识形态(节选本)[M],人民出版社,2003年,112,118
[26] Eugene Kamenka, The Ethical Foundation of Marxism(2nd,ed) Routledge & Kegan Paul,Boston, 1972, P97
[29] [美] 德布拉·萨茨,马克思主义、唯物主义和历史进步,载[加] 罗伯特·韦尔,凯尔森编,鲁克俭等译,分析马克思主义新论[C],中国人民大学出版社,2002年,309

Marx's Critique of Moral Philosophy

马克思的道德哲学批判

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(6): 45-48.
[2]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(6): 49-53.
[3]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(6): 54-58.
[4]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(6): 59-63.
[5]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(6): 64-68.
[6]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(6): 69-74.
[7]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(6): 75-79.
[8]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(6): 128-131.
[9]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(5): 71-75.
[10]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(2): 27-32.
[11]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(2): 33-39.
[12]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(1): 28-31.
[13]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(1): 45-49.
[14]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(1): 57-61.
[15]	. [J]. Studies in Ethics, 2015, 75(1): 62-67.