Studies in Ethics ›› 2010(3): 11-16.
Previous Articles Next Articles
YAN Shun-li, DUN Peng
Received:
Online:
Published:
闫顺利, 敦鹏
作者简介:
基金资助:
Abstract: Postmodernism criticized the intellectual consciousness and its inclination of interitism, and it therefore is a new enlightment. However, postmodernism was evitable trapped into another metaphysics after disintegrating traditional metaphysics, as a result, it initiated the self-opposite of pluralistic concept of value ultimately. How can pluralistic concept of value go on? Various academicians give various disintegrating strategies in the value concept of disputes of various gods, among these strategies, establishing “Boundary Consciousness” is the most effective way.
Key words: Pluralistic Concept of Value, Postmodernism, Metaphysics, Field Separation, Boundary Consciousness
摘要: 后现代主义批判了传统形而上学的知性意识及其整体主义致思,不啻为一次新启蒙。然而,后现代主义在解构了旧形而上学之后却不自觉地陷入另一种形而上学,并且在其后果上引发了价值多元主义的自我悖谬。价值多元化何以可能?在一个“诸神纷争”的价值处境中学者们提出了不同的消解策略,其中确立一种“边界意识”具有理论合理性。
关键词: 价值多元化, 后现代主义, 形而上学, 领域分离, 边界意识
CLC Number:
B82-02
YAN Shun-li, DUN Peng. How Can Pluralistic Concept of Value Go on——The Value Paradox of Postmodernism and Its Disintegrate Strategies[J]. Studies in Ethics, 2010(3): 11-16.
闫顺利, 敦鹏. 价值多元化何以可能——后现代主义的价值困境及其消解策略[J]. 伦理学研究, 2010(3): 11-16.
0 / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX