中国伦理学会会刊
国家社科基金资助期刊
中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国人文社会科学核心期刊

伦理学研究 ›› 2009(1): 77-83.

• 探讨与争鸣 • 上一篇    下一篇

道德责任判断的三重根据

郭金鸿   

  1. 青岛大学 师范学院,山东 青岛 266071
  • 收稿日期:2008-11-20 出版日期:2009-01-10 发布日期:2022-03-03
  • 作者简介:郭金鸿(1970-),女,山东枣庄人,青岛大学师范学院哲学系副教授,哲学博士。
  • 基金资助:
    青岛市社会科学规划项目“道德责任研究”(QDSKL070124)。

Three Foundation on Judgment of Moral Responsibility

GUO Jin-hong   

  1. Philosophy department of normal college,Qingdao University, Qingdao,Shandong 266071,China
  • Received:2008-11-20 Online:2009-01-10 Published:2022-03-03

摘要: 道德责任判断的直接目的在于找出可称赞或谴责的原因,对行为者做出合理、公正的道德判断,使其承担应当承担的道德责任,从而减少和消除不公,融洽社会关系,引导行为主体朝向更崇高的目标。道德责任判定涉及行为者与行为之间的关系、行为后果和价值标准等方面。实际后果是道德责任判断的现实根据;因果关系是道德责任判断的逻辑根据;社会历史理性是道德责任判断的最终价值根据。

关键词: 道德责任, 判断根据, 因果关系, 社会历史理性

Abstract: the direct purpose of judgment of moral responsibility is to find the reason of being worth praise or blame,to do reasonable and fair judgment of moral for the agent,to make him undertake his desert moral responsibility,to reduce and eliminate unfair,make the social relations harmonious,guide agents to more lofty idea. Judgment of moral responsibility relates to the relation between agent and action,consequence of action,standard of values, etc.. For judgment of moral responsibility,realistic consequence is an actual foundation;causal relationship is a logical foundation;the reason of society and history is the final value foundation.

Key words: moral responsibility, foundation on judgment, causal relationship, the reason of society and history

中图分类号: