乔纳森·海特之道德基础理论评析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 道德基础理论的内涵包括先天道德心灵初稿论、后天文化学习修正论、道德判断直觉论和道德基础多元论四个不可分割的组成部分。除“修正”论外,其他部分都受到了不同程度的质疑或批判,海特对此作出了比较系统的解释和回应。道德基础理论以“初稿”论和“修正”论为立论起点,精心制作了道德判断的社会直觉主义模式,用五项标准筛选出了六组道德基础,理论体系比较完备且具有广泛的应用性;综合运用了多学科的最新研究成果,向道德认知发展理论提出了挑战,拓展了道德研究的方法和视野;理论体系阐释略显简单而随意,有待进一步完善,其发展和应用空间也值得认真审视。

关键词: 乔纳森·海特, 道德基础理论, 道德直觉主义, 分析与评价

中图分类号:

B82-09

曹洪军. 乔纳森·海特之道德基础理论评析[J]. 伦理学研究, 2015(1): 72-78.

参考文献

[1] Jesse Graham,Jonathan Haidt,Sena Koleva,Matt Motyl,Ravi Iyer,Sean P. Wojcik,Peter H.Ditto. Moral Foundations Theory:The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism[J].Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,2013,47:55-130.
[2] Richerson P. J.,& Boyd,R. Not by genes alone:How culture transformed human evolution[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2005.
[3] Jonathan Haidt.The Righteous Mind:Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion[M].London:Allen Lane,2012.
[4] Marcus,G.The birth of the mind[M].New York:Basic,2004.
[5] Pinker,S.The blank slate:The modern denial of human nature[M].New York:Viking,2002.
[6] Haidt,J.,Koller,S.,&Dias,M.Affect,culture,and morality,or is it wrong to eat your dog?[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1993,65:613-628.
[7] Haidt,J.The Happiness Hypothesis:Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom[M].New York,Basic Books,2006.1-22.
[8] Haidt,J.,&Bjorklund,F.Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions about Moral Psychology. In W.Sinnott-Armstrong(Ed.),Moral Psychology,2008,2:The Cognitive Science of Morality:Intuition and Diversity.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.181-217.
[9] Jonathan Haidt.The Emotional Dog and It s Rational Tail,A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment[J].Psychological Review,2001,108:814-834.
[10] Haidt J.The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology[J].Science,2007,316:998-1002.
[11] Rozin P,Haidt J,McCauley C,et al. Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity:Comparisons and Evaluations of Paper-and-pencil versus Behavioral Measures[J].Journal of Research in Personality ,1999,33(3):330-351.
[12] Muller J Z.What Is Conservative Social and Political Thought? In J. Z. Muller(Ed.),Conservatism:an Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present. Princeton,NJ:Princet on University Press,1997.
[13] Suhler C. L.,& Churchland,P. Can innate,modular “foundations” explain morality? Challenges for Haidt’s moral foundations theory[J].Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,2011,23(9),2103-2116.
[14] Narvaez,D.The social-intuitionist model:Some counter-intuitions. In W. A.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.),Moral psychology,Vol.2,The cognitive science of morality:Intuition and diversity. Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2008. 233-240.
[15] Gudbjartsson D. F.,Walters G. B.,Thorleifsson,G.,Stefansson,H.,Halldorsson B. V.,Zusmanovich,P.,et al.Many sequence variants affecting diversity of adult human height[J].Nature Genetics,2008,40:609-615.
[16] Turkheimer,E.Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean[J].Current Directions in Psychological Science,2000,9:160-164.
[17] Spelke E. S.Core knowledge[J].American Psychologist,2000,55:1233-1243.
[18] Hamlin,K.,Wynn,K.,& Bloom,P. Social evaluation by preverbal infants[J].Nature,2007,450:557-559.
[19] Tooby,J.,Cosmides,L.,& Barrett,H. C. Resolving the debate on innate ideas:Learnability constraints and the evolved interpenetration of motivational and conceptualfunctions[M].In P. Carruthers,S. Laurence,& S. Stich (Eds.),The innate mind:Structure and contents. New York:Oxford ,2005. 305-337.
[20] Narvaez,D.Moral complexity:The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning[J].Perspectives on Psychological Science,2010,5:163-181.
[21] Kurt Gray,Daniel M.Wegner. Morality Takes Two:Dyadic Morality and Mind Perception. Mikulincer,Mario (Ed);Shaver,Phillip R.(Ed),. The social psychology of morality:Exploring the causes of good and evil. Herzliya series on personality and social psychology.,2012.109-127.
[22] Gray,K.,Young,L.,& Waytz,A. Mind perception is the essence of morality[J].Psychological Inquiry,2012,23:101-124.
[23] Harris,S.The moral landscape:How science can determine human values[M].New York:Free Press ,2010.89-181.
[24] Ditto P. H.,Liu,B.,& Wojcik,S. P. Is anything sacred anymore? Commentary on target article. Mind perception is the essence of morality[J].Psychological Inquiry,2012,23:155-161.
[25] Jost J. T.Group morality and ideology:Left and right,right and wrong. Paper presented to the Society for Personality and Social Psychology annual conference,Tampa,FL,2009.
[26] Janoff-Bulman,R.,& Sheikh,S. The forbidden,the obligatory,and the permitted:Moral regulation and political orientation. Paper presented to the Society for Personality and Social Psychology annual conference,San Diego,CA,2012.
[27] Rai T. S.,& Fiske,A. P. Moral psychology is relationship regulation:Moral motives for unity,hierarchy,equality,and proportionality[J].Psychological Review,2011,118:57-75.
[28] Jarudi I. N.Everyday morality and the status quo:Conservative concerns about moral purity,moral evaluations of everyday objects,and moral objections to performance enhancement,Doctoral dissertation,Yale University,2009.
[29] Haidt,J.,& Joseph,C. The moral mind:How 5 sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues,and perhaps even modules[J].In P.Carruthers,S. Laurence & S. Stich (Eds.),The innate mind:Vol. 3.New York:Oxford,2007.367-391.
[30] Shweder R A,Mahapatra M,Miller J G.Culture and Moral Development ,Cultural Psychology:Essays on Comparative Human Development[M].New York,NY:Cambridge University Press,1990. 130-204.
[31] Bruce Maxwell and Darcia Narvaez. Moral foundations theory and moral development and education[J].Journal of Moral Education,2013,42(3):271-280.
[32] Haidt J,Graham J.When Morality Opposes Justice:Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals May Not Recognize[J].Social Justice Research ,2007,20:98-116.