乔纳森?海特之道德基础理论评析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 乔纳森?海特之道德基础理论包括道德心灵“初稿”论、文化学习“修正”论、道德判断直觉论和道德基础多元论四个不可分割的组成部分。除文化学习“修正”论外，其它三个部分都直接受到了不同程度的质疑或批判，海特对此作出了比较系统的解释和回应。道德基础理论以“初稿”论和“修正”论为立论起点，制作了道德判断的社会直觉主义模式，用五项标准筛选出了六组道德基础，理论体系比较完备且具有较广泛的应用性；道德基础理论综合运用了多学科的最新研究成果，向道德认知发展理论提出了挑战，拓展了道德研究的方法和视野；道德基础的理论体系阐释显得简单而随意，有待进一步完善，其发展和应用空间也值得认真审视。

关键词: 乔纳森?海特, 道德基础理论, 道德直觉主义, 分析与评价

曹洪军. 乔纳森?海特之道德基础理论评析[J]. 伦理学研究.

参考文献

[1] Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt, Sena Koleva, Matt Motyl,Ravi Iyer, Sean P. Wojcik, Peter H. Ditto. Moral Foundations Theory:The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism[J].Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2013, 47:55–130. [2]Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R.. Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution[M].Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. [3]Jonathan Haidt.The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion[M]. London：Allen Lane,2012. [4]Marcus, G.. The birth of the mind[M]. New York: Basic ,2004. [5]Pinker, S.. The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature[M]. New York: Viking ,2002. [6]Haidt, J., Koller, S.,&Dias, M.. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? [J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 65：613–628. [7] Haidt, J..The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom[M].New York,Basic Books, 2006.1–22. [8]Haidt,J.,&Bjorklund,F..Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions about Moral Psychology.In W.Sinnott-Armstrong(Ed.),Moral Psychology, 2008，2:The Cognitive Science of Morality:Intuition and Diversity.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.181–217. [9] Jonathan Haidt . The Emotional Dog and It s Rational Tail, A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment[J]. Psychological Review, 2001, 108:814–834. [10]Haidt J. The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology[J]. Science,2007, 316: 998–1002. [11]Rozin P, Haidt J, McCauley C, et al. Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity: Comparisons and Evaluations of Paper- and - pencil versus Behavioral Measures[J]. Journal of Research in Personality , 1999, 33( 3) : 330–351. [12]Muller J Z. What Is Conservative Social and Political Thought ? In J. Z. Muller ( Ed. ) , Conservatism: an Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present .Princeton , NJ: Princet on University Press, 1997. [13]Suhler, C. L., & Churchland, P.. Can innate, modular “foundations” explain morality?Challenges for Haidt’s moral foundations theory[J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2011,23(9), 2103–2116. [14]Narvaez, D.. The social-intuitionist model: Some counter-intuitions. In W. A.Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol.2, The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008. 233–240. [15] Gudbjartsson, D. F., Walters, G. B., Thorleifsson, G., Stefansson, H., Halldorsson, B. V.,Zusmanovich, P., et al.. Many sequence variants affecting diversity of adult human height[J]. Nature Genetics, 2008,40:609–615. [16]Turkheimer, E.. Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2000,9:160–164. [17]Spelke, E. S.. Core knowledge[J]. American Psychologist, 2000,55:1233–1243. [18]Hamlin, K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P.. Social evaluation by preverbal infants[J]. Nature, 2007,450:557–559. [19]Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Barrett, H. C.. Resolving the debate on innate ideas:Learnability constraints and the evolved interpenetration of motivational and conceptualfunctions[M]. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Structure and contents. New York: Oxford ,2005. 305–337. [20]Narvaez, D.. Moral complexity: The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning[J]. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2010,5:163–181. [21]Kurt Gray，Daniel M. Wegner. Morality Takes Two: Dyadic Morality and Mind Perception. Mikulincer, Mario (Ed); Shaver, Phillip R. (Ed),. The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil. Herzliya series on personality and social psychology., 2012.109–127. [22]Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A.. Mind perception is the essence of morality[J]. Psychological Inquiry, 2012,23:101–124. [23]Harris, S.. The moral landscape: How science can determine human values[M]. New York: Free Press ,2010.89–181. [24]Ditto, P. H., Liu, B., & Wojcik, S. P.. Is anything sacred anymore? Commentary on target article. Mind perception is the essence of morality[J]. Psychological Inquiry, 2012,23:155–161. [25]Jost, J. T.. Group morality and ideology: Left and right, right and wrong. Paper presented to the Society for Personality and Social Psychology annual conference, Tampa,FL,2009. [26]Janoff-Bulman, R., & Sheikh, S.. The forbidden, the obligatory, and the permitted:Moral regulation and political orientation. Paper presented to the Society for Personality and Social Psychology annual conference, San Diego, CA,2012. [27]Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P.. Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality[J]. Psychological Review, 2011,118:57–75. [28]Jarudi, I. N.. Everyday morality and the status quo: Conservative concerns about moral purity, moral evaluations of everyday objects, and moral objections to performance enhancement, Doctoral dissertation, Yale University ,2009. [29]Haidt, J., & Joseph, C.. The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules [J]. In P.Carruthers, S. Laurence & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Vol. 3..New York: Oxford ,2007. 367–391. [30] Shweder R A, Mahapatra M, Miller J G. Culture and Moral Development , Cultural Psychology : Essays on Comparative Human Development[M] . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 130–204. [31] Bruce Maxwell and Darcia Narvaez. Moral foundations theory and moral development and education[J]. Journal of Moral Education, 2013, 42(3): 271-280. [32] Haidt J ,Graham J. When Morality Opposes Justice:Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals May Not Recognize[J]. Social Justice Research , 2007, 20: 98-116.