重审民族责任与全球平等主义——对米勒相关理论的辩护与批评

伦理学研究 ›› 2023 (2): 111-118.

重审民族责任与全球平等主义——对米勒相关理论的辩护与批评

王莹莹

出版日期:2023-03-10 发布日期:2023-05-05
作者简介:王莹莹,同济大学马克思主义学院助理教授。
基金资助:
* 本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目“《正义论》之后西方平等主义理论发展与批判研究”（20CZX053）的阶段性成果

Re-Examining National Responsibility and Global Egalitarianism： A Defense and Critics of David Miller’s Theory

WANG Ying-ying

Online:2023-03-10 Published:2023-05-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在当代全球正义的讨论中,关于民族责任与全球平等主义的研究一直是热点话题。戴维·米勒提出了一种具有广泛影响的民族责任理论,并为民族国家承担集体责任与继承性责任进行规范性辩护。当前对于米勒的民族责任理论有诸多批驳,但通过分析可以看到,这些批驳都很难站得住脚。然而,米勒在重视民族责任的基础上,拒斥全球平等主义的观点是有问题的。无论在抽象理论层面,还是在应对气候变暖等全球公共实践层面,民族责任只有与全球平等主义原则相结合,才是一种更恰当的选择。

关键词: 米勒, 民族责任, 全球平等主义, 责任, 正义

王莹莹. 重审民族责任与全球平等主义——对米勒相关理论的辩护与批评[J]. 伦理学研究, 2023(2): 111-118.

WANG Ying-ying. Re-Examining National Responsibility and Global Egalitarianism： A Defense and Critics of David Miller’s Theory[J]. Studies in Ethics, 2023(2): 111-118.

参考文献

[1] MILLER D.National Responsibility and Global Justice[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2007.
[2] MAY L.Sharing Responsibility[M]. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1996.
[3] PIERIK R.Collective Responsibility and National Responsibility[J]. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy,2008,11(4).
[4] LIPPERT-RASMUSSEN K.Responsible Nations:Miller on National Responsibility[J]. Ethics & Global Politics,2009,2(2).
[5] MILLER D.On Nationality[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1995.
[6] PARFIT D.Reasons and Persons[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1984.
[7] KERSHNAR S.Justice for the Past[M]. New York:State University of New York Press,2004.
[8] KUKATHAS C.Who?Whom?Reparations and the Problem of Agency[J]. Journal of Social Philosophy,2006,37(3).
[9] WALDRON J.Superseding Historic Injustice[J]. Ethics,1992,103(1).
[10] THOMPSON J.The Apology Paradox[J]. The Philosophical Quarterly,2000,50(201).
[11] MILLER D.Justice for Earthlings:Essays in Political Philosophy[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2022.
[12] RAWLS J.The Law of People[M]. Cambridge,Mass.:Harvard University Press,1999.
[13] 贝茨. 正义与国际关系[C]//全球正义.徐向东,编.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2011.
[14] TAN K C. Justice,Institutions,andLuck:The Site,Ground,and Scope of Equality[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2012.
[15] PARFIT D.Equality or Priority[J]. Ratio,1997,10(3).
[16] WILLIAMS A.Fertility and Collective Responsibility[C]// BUTT D,FINE S,STEMPLOWSKA Z(eds.). Political Philosophy,Here and Now:Essays in Honour of David Miller. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2022.
[17] MILLER D.Global Justice and Climate Change:How Should Responsibilities Be Distributed?[J]. Tanner Lectures on Human Values,2009,28.
[18] CASAL P.Progressive Environmental Taxation:A Defence[J]. Political Studies,2012,60(2).
[19] GARDINER S.Rawls and Climate Change:Does Rawlsian Political Philosophy Pass the Global Test?[J]. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy,2011,14(2).