新兴技术与实验伦理学的双向互动

伦理学研究 ›› 2022 (1): 99-105.

新兴技术与实验伦理学的双向互动

白惠仁

出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-04-21
作者简介:白惠仁,浙江大学哲学学院“百人计划”研究员,博士生导师。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“大数据环境下信息价值开发的伦理约束机制研究”（17ZDA023）阶段性成果

The Interaction Between Emerging Technology and Experimental Ethics

BAI Hui-ren

Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-04-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当下人工智能、生命科学等领域中新兴技术的迭代所形成的对人类道德秩序的搅动使实验伦理学的研究方法受到了新的挑战。实验伦理学需要依赖新技术路径应对其他新兴技术所产生的道德难题,如利用大数据、虚拟现实研究人工智能的道德决策。但实验伦理学的新技术路径自身又会负载实验方法的科研伦理困境。因此,新兴技术既产生了新的道德难题,也推动了实验伦理学研究框架的变革,二者之间可能的协同演化关系是：新兴技术依靠实验伦理学获得道德合法性,实验伦理学则借助新兴技术扩展研究视野。

关键词: 新兴技术, 自动驾驶, 道德决策, 实验伦理学

白惠仁. 新兴技术与实验伦理学的双向互动[J]. 伦理学研究, 2022(1): 99-105.

BAI Hui-ren. The Interaction Between Emerging Technology and Experimental Ethics[J]. Studies in Ethics, 2022(1): 99-105.

参考文献

[1] COCA-VILA I.Self-driving Cars in Dilemmatic Situations:An Approach Based on the Theory of Justification in Criminal Law[J].Criminal Law and Philosophy,2018,12(1).
[2] Ethics Commission’s Complete Report on Automated and Connected Driving[M/OL].Federal Minister of Transport and Digital Infrastructure,2017[2021-11-30].https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/EN/publications/report-ethics-commission.html?nn=187598.
[3] BONNEFON J F,SHARIFFA A,RAHWAN I.The Social Dilemma of Autonomous Vehicles[J].Science,2016,352(6293).
[4] LEBEN D.A Rawlsian Algorithm for Autonomous Vehicles[J].Ethics and Information Technology,2017,19(2).
[5] MLADENOVIC M N,MCPHERSON T.Engineering Social Justice into Traffic Control for Self-Driving Vehicles?[J].Science and Engineering Ethics,2016,22(4).
[6] DIETRICH M,WEISSWANGE T H.Distributive Justice as an Ethical Principle for Autonomous Vehicle Behavior Beyond Hazard Scenarios[J].Ethics and Information Technology,2019,21(3).
[7] KEELING G. Legal Necessity,Pareto Efficiency & Justified Killing in Autonomous Vehicle Collisions[J].Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,2018,21(2).
[8] NYHOLM S,SMIDS J.The Ethics of Accident-Algorithms for Self-Driving Cars:an Applied Trolley Problem?[J].Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,2016,19(5).
[9] NYHOLM S.The Ethics of Crashes with Self-Driving Cars:A Roadmap,I[J].Philosophy Compass,2018,13(7).
[10] HIMMELREICH J.Never Mind the Trolley:The Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles in Mundane Situations[J].Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,2018,21(3).
[11] GREENE J D,SOMMERVILLE R B,NYSTROM L E,et al.An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment[J].Science,2001,293(5537).
[12] AWAD E,DSOUZA S,KIM R,et al.The Moral Machine Experiment[J].Nature,2018,563(7729).
[13] BIGMAN Y E,GRAY K.People are Averse to Machines Making Moral Decisions[J].Cognition,2018,181.
[14] SUTFELD L R,GAST R,KONIG P,et al.Using Virtual Reality to Assess Ethical Decisions in Road Traffic Scenarios:Applicability of Value-of-Life-Based Models and Influences of Time Pressure[J].Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience,2017,11.
[15] HAIDT J.The Emotional Dog and its Rational Tail:A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment[J].Psychol Rev,2001,108(4).
[16] MOLL J,SCHULKIN J.Social Attachment and Aversion in Human Moral Cognition[J].Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,2009,33(3).
[17] MUSEN J.The Moral Psychology of Obligations to Help Those in Need[D].Department of Psychology,Harvard University,2010.
[18] GREENE J D.Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality:Why Cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics[J].Ethics,2014,124(4).
[19] 段伟文.虚拟现实技术的社会伦理问题与应对[J].科技中国,2018(7).
[20] HUANG K,GREENE J D,BAZERMAN M.Veil-of-Ignorance Reasoning Favors the Greater Good[J].Proceedings of the national academy of sciences,2019,116(48).
[21] MUSSCHENGA A W,MEYNEN G.Moral Progress:an Introduction[J].Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,2017,20(1).
[22] POLZLER T,PAULO N.Thought Experiments and Experimental Ethics[J].Inquiry,2021.
[23] KAHANE G.The Armchair and the Trolley:An Argument for Experimental Ethics[J].Philosophical Studies,2013,162(2).