中国伦理学会会刊
国家社科基金资助期刊
中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国人文社会科学核心期刊

伦理学研究 ›› 2004(1): 52-56.

• 应用伦理学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论 “自然剃刀”

颜青山   

  1. 湖南师范大学 哲学系,湖南 长沙 410081
  • 收稿日期:2003-09-30 出版日期:2004-01-10 发布日期:2022-03-11
  • 作者简介:颜青山(1967-),男,湖南衡南人,理学硕士(生物学),哲学博士,湖南师范大学哲学系副教授,主要研究方向为生命伦理学和科学哲学。

On “Natural Razor”

YAN Qingshan   

  1. Institute of Ethics,Hunan Normal University, Changsha Hunan 410081 China
  • Received:2003-09-30 Online:2004-01-10 Published:2022-03-11

摘要: 直觉地看,生态伦理学的基本原则应该是,我们的行为应该有利于或无害于生态系统。然而,这个原则却在认识论和价值论上都存在着困难,首先,我们无法在原则上知道我们的行为是否有利或无害于生态系统,其次,我们不能保证我们的生态学知识可以充分地推出这个积极的原则。因此,“自然剃刀”的消极原则是:如无必要,不应该增加对生态系统的人为干预。

关键词: 生态伦理学, 伦理原则, 自然剃刀, 奥卡姆剃刀, 自由剃刀

Abstract: Intuitionally, the basic principle of ecological ethics should be thatour behaviors ought to be beneficent or non-maleficent to the ecological system. But there are two problems in it, one is epistemological and another is axiological. The former is how we can know if our behaviors are beneficent or non-maleficent to the ecological system. The latter is whether our knowledge about the ecological system is sufficient to make so positive a principle. I think we can give negative answers to the two questions. So we can simply have a negative principle to ecological ethics. That is that we shouldn't disturb the ecological system if unnecessary. That is so-called “natural razor”.

Key words: ecological ethics, ethical principle, natural

中图分类号: