中国伦理学会会刊
国家社科基金资助期刊
中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国人文社会科学核心期刊

伦理学研究 ›› 2007(5): 98-103.

• 外国伦理思想 • 上一篇    下一篇

麦金太尔何以断言启蒙道德筹划是失败的?—兼论道德哲学中的“一”与“多”

李义天   

  1. 中央编译局 当代所,北京 100032
  • 收稿日期:2007-05-10 出版日期:2007-09-10 发布日期:2022-02-10
  • 作者简介:李义天(1979-),男,湖北武汉人,中央编译局当代所,哲学博士。

How Does MacIntyre Assert the Failure of the Enlightenment Project?

LI Yi-tian   

  1. Institute of Present Age Marxism Research Central Bureau of Complilation &Translation,Beijing,10032 China
  • Received:2007-05-10 Online:2007-09-10 Published:2022-02-10

摘要: 麦金太尔关于“启蒙道德筹划失败”的断言可能导致两种相反理解。麦氏认为,情感主义者放任道德分歧(多),须对无休止的道德争论负责。启蒙筹划虽然寻求普遍性方案,然其背后却深藏不可公度的前提,同样导致不可公度的各家之言。只不过,后者仍试图用理性来解决,而前者则“坦率地”放弃这种努力。为缓解道德分歧,麦金太尔引入传统合理性。但亦存在问题。生活境遇的改变,使我们须悬置先入之见,通过对话重新圈定道德普世性(一)与道德分殊性(多)的话语范围。

关键词: 启蒙的道德筹划, 不可公度, 道德普世性(一), 道德分殊性(多)

Abstract: Starting from the two opponent views on the failure of the Enlightenment Projects,this paper analyzed A. MacIntyre's doctrine of moral theory.In MacIntyre's opinion,while contemporary emotivism led to incommensurable moral particularity, he Enlightenment Projects did not achieve its purpose for moral universality, because their premises were incommensurable,either. he difference between emotivists and enlightenment thinkers was that the latter stick to dealing with moral disagreenment in a rational way,but the former had given up.MacIntyre was not satisfied with such two attitudes and planned to discuss it in a traditional rational way.However,his plan encountered lots of difficulties.My viewpoint is that only by enough rational discourse,can we put moral university and moral particularity to rights

Key words: Enlightenment Project, incommensurable, moral university, moral particularity

中图分类号: