中国伦理学会会刊
国家社科基金资助期刊
中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国人文社会科学核心期刊

伦理学研究 ›› 2008(2): 78-83.

• 生态伦理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

改造自然世界的道德合理性追问

曹孟勤   

  1. 南京师范大学 公共管理学院,江苏 南京 210097
  • 收稿日期:2007-10-22 出版日期:2008-03-10 发布日期:2022-01-25
  • 作者简介:曹孟勤(1957-),男,河北保定人,南京师范大学公共管理学院教授,哲学博士。

Seeking the Moral rationality of Reconstruct Natural World

CAO Meng-qin   

  1. College of Public Administration Academy Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210097,China
  • Received:2007-10-22 Online:2008-03-10 Published:2022-01-25

摘要: 在现代人的视阈中,改造自然界的实践活动由于能够满足人类生存的需要,因而天然具有道德合理性。而恰恰在这种道德合理性背后却蕴涵着生物还原主义倾向和人对自然世界进行掠夺的逻辑张力。现代性社会的大量生产、大量消费和大量浪费的经济运行模式建立在这一道德合理性基础上。走出现代性道德理念的这种悖论性困境,需要改变评价这种道德合理性的认知向度,从人与自然共在的人性存在中确证改造自然界的道德合理性。只有合乎人与自然世界共在之人性的实践活动才具有道德合理性。

关键词: 自然界, 实践, 道德, 合理性

Abstract: In the eye of Modernist, the practice of reconstructing nature has natural moral rationality for fulfilling the requirement of human existence. Whereas, it is such moral rationality that contains the tendency of biological reductivism and the tension of predatory of nature.The modern economic pattern of massive production, tremendous consumption and gigantic wastefulness is constructed on such moral rationality ideas. In order to break through such modern rationality dilemma, it is required that we should change such cognitive direction to corroborate moral rationality of reconstructing nature from the angle of coexistence of man and nature. Only such practice of conforming with coexistence of man and nature can have moral rationality.

Key words: nature, practice, morality, rationality

中图分类号: