中国伦理学会会刊
国家社科基金资助期刊
中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊
全国中文核心期刊
中国人文社会科学核心期刊

伦理学研究

• •    

道德想象力的悖论、矛盾与概念张力探析

曲蓉   

  1. 宁波大学
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-15 修回日期:2014-12-08 发布日期:2015-06-01
  • 通讯作者: 曲蓉

The Paradox , Antinomy and Tensions of the Concept about the Moral Imagination

  • Received:2014-09-15 Revised:2014-12-08 Published:2015-06-01

摘要: 在伦理学研究中,道德想象力是一个具有挑战性的术语。对许多学者而言,道德想象力的合理性是一个悖论:我们既无法想象贫乏的道德,也无法任由想象力在伦理学领域的任意驰骋。康德关于两种同情的区分,承认了具有情感联结能力和理性认知能力的道德想象力(同情)的合理性,否定了同情心的道德价值。认知的与移情的道德想象力分别与道德理性、道德情感具有密切联系,二者对道德影响和作用的机制不同,将二者视为同一事物近乎矛盾。实际上,二者的矛盾与道德固有的高远性与卑近性的特质是相关的,我们可能无法破解这一矛盾,可行的选择是通过探究这一矛盾所形成的张力以确定道德想象力的范围。

关键词: 道德想象力, 想象力, 道德认知, 道德理性, 移情, 同情心

Abstract: In the study of ethics, moral imagination is a challenging term.For many scholars, the reasonableness of moral imagination is a paradox: we cannot imagine morality with poor imagination,and we cannot let imagination plays a leading in the ethics.By distinguishing two kinds of moral sympathy, Kant admitted the emotional bonding ability and cognitive ability of the moral imagination,yet denied the moral values of compassion. The cognitive imagination has a close connection with the moral rationality, and the empathic imagination has a connection with the moral emotion. These two have so different mechanism in having an influence on morality that if they were regarded as the same thing, it will be a antinomy. In fact , these inherent antinomies is relevant to the lofty and basic Characteristic of morality .We cannot resolve these antinomies,but we can determine the range of the moral imagination by exploring the tensions formed by these antinomies.

Key words: Moral Imagination, Imagination, Moral cognition, Moral rationality, Sympathy, Compassion